CO129-240 - Public Offices & Others - 1888 — Page 489

Our letter to Treasury [written befor any

358561 Genshin

Akay "Muinte existed?) asked that M. Inglis might be granted

special case

as a

d this

in reply (5109/61) allowed

1.8. fourtion

yer.

The reperon had recommendin

reusim,

Treasur him to £163.6.8°

in Jylan shudd sixtiether of his salary (£700)

resence for pension in and respect of his mine gears sener

Could

we therefore reconsider I. climates, & the the I the ground that Thumsett's. case

find that his predecesser, not qualifying for pension during the period from 1 Mar, 1861 £1 Sef 1841 ?

we

M. Meade.

to

S.W.2.19/5

W.

Thewe looked at the Correr, inthe Hound Volumes; I gather that fir H. R. gave Mr. Jughes the 6 months leave, thent his pension papers home at the same time, to not in the keat expecting the Ireasary to grant the latter.

The pension did not actually commence until the leave capiced, t so I consider that M. duplex was qualifying for pension dasing much leave. Stad Re for better, or had the Treasury reford the pension,

Dr. Inglis would probably have your back & makeup

hesitated to a dop a she, they decided mentirias canc

It would t bad preced sud

*

477

that he had secured the service to Mr Thomsett, then still in the Navy, to act as Harbor Master during, Mr I's sick leave

did not five

W. Thom sett

Consider that h

Wh

any

clain to

then permanents

brought into the Hougkay service

I thould capress repret that Lord K.

Lees to ground for reconsidering his

decision on that point.

Min 22/5/88.

Jagree

Run 2576

stones

hi to years service.

And the despatch of

Lir M. Rotrison's 3588/4, in which he

reports